All insights Employment

MOHRE flags a 'fake Emirati' hire: what penalties actually follow?

UAE · Emiratisation enforcement
Photo: ANOOF C / Unsplash

With 377 fake Emiratisation cases uncovered at 266 private companies this year, the exposure is no longer theoretical, and it goes well beyond a fine on the HR budget.

What counts as a "fake" case

A fake Emiratisation case is not simply a paperwork error. MOHRE treats it as fraud on the national quota system: an Emirati national is registered on a company's labour card and Wages Protection System (WPS) file, sometimes even drawing a Nafis salary top-up, without ever actually performing the role. Common patterns MOHRE has flagged include:

  • An Emirati national listed as a full-time employee who in reality works elsewhere, or nowhere.
  • A nominal salary transfer through WPS that is partially or wholly returned to the employer in cash.
  • A genuine hire on paper but no real attendance, output or reporting line, used purely to hit the mandatory Emiratisation percentage.
  • Multiple companies (often linked by ownership or a shared HR consultant) rotating the same national's name across different trade licences to claim quota credit more than once.

The common thread is intent: the arrangement exists to manufacture compliance with the Emiratisation quota and unlock its benefits (reduced quota fees, easier work permit issuance, access to Nafis subsidies) rather than to employ someone.

How MOHRE actually catches it

These cases are rarely caught by a single tell. MOHRE cross-references several independent data sets that are hard to falsify consistently:

  • GPSSA pension contributions against the declared employment start date and salary.
  • WPS salary transfers against declared basic and allowance figures, and any pattern of reversal or third-party transfers out of the employee's account shortly after payment.
  • Physical and remote inspection, including site visits and calls to the registered employee to verify actual attendance and duties.
  • Nafis subsidy records, since a subsidy claimed for a role that does not exist is a red flag MOHRE and the Nafis programme now share.
  • Tip-offs, frequently from disgruntled former employees, competing bidders on a tender who suspect a rival's quota compliance is fabricated, or the Emirati national themselves after a dispute over the arrangement.

The penalties that follow

Once a case is confirmed, the consequences compound quickly rather than landing as a single fine:

  • A financial penalty per fabricated case, applied per Emirati national found to be falsely registered, not per inspection.
  • Automatic downgrade to MOHRE's lowest compliance tier, which immediately restricts new work permit issuance and increases the fees payable on every existing and future permit.
  • Retroactive quota recalculation: the fake hire is stripped from the Emiratisation count, which can push the company below its required percentage and trigger the separate shortfall penalty on top of the fraud penalty.
  • Suspension from Nafis benefits and other Emiratisation incentive schemes for a defined period, and clawback of any subsidy already disbursed.
  • Exclusion from government tenders and procurement pre-qualification lists that require an Emiratisation compliance certificate, which for many contractors and suppliers is commercially more damaging than the fine itself.

The fine is the least of it: the quota downgrade and tender exclusion are what actually shut a business down.

Personal and criminal exposure

Where the arrangement involves falsified employment contracts, forged attendance or payroll records, or the diversion of a Nafis subsidy, MOHRE can refer the file to the Public Prosecution. That opens exposure under the UAE Penal Code for forgery and, where a state subsidy was actually drawn down, for embezzlement or fraud against public funds. Company directors and the HR manager who signed off on the arrangement are the natural targets of any criminal referral, not just the corporate entity. A director convicted on this basis also faces the standard fallout for any UAE fraud conviction: difficulty obtaining future visas, sponsorships and business licences.

What to do if the arrangement already exists

If an internal review turns up a nominal Emirati hire with no genuine role, the priority is to convert it into a genuine one, or unwind it, before an inspection does it for you. That means either giving the individual real duties, reporting lines and verifiable attendance from that point forward, or formally terminating the contract and correcting the WPS and Nafis records rather than letting the arrangement continue quietly. Companies that self-correct and can show a genuine, documented change are treated very differently by MOHRE from those caught mid-scheme. Waiting for an inspection to raise the question removes that option entirely.

Key references: Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2021 on the Regulation of Labour Relations; MOHRE Emiratisation and Nafis programme rules; UAE Penal Code provisions on forgery and fraud. General information, not legal advice.

Have a matter to discuss?

If a regulatory change or a dispute is on your desk, let's talk it through, confidentially and without obligation.

Get in touch